Skip to main content
Back to Glossary
Glossary Term

MQM (Multidimensional Quality Metrics)

Abbreviation: MQM

MQM is an industry-standard framework for evaluating translation quality that categorizes errors by type (accuracy, fluency, terminology, style) and severity (critical, major, minor).

3 min read
quality-assessmentstandardsmqm

What is MQM?

MQM (Multidimensional Quality Metrics) is a comprehensive framework for assessing translation quality. Developed through collaboration between DFKI (German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence) and the QT21 project, MQM provides a standardized way to identify, categorize, and measure translation errors.

The framework is standardized under ISO 21999 and is widely used in the localization industry for objective quality assessment.

Why MQM Matters

Traditional translation quality assessment often relied on subjective judgments like "good" or "bad." MQM transforms this into a data-driven process by:

  • Providing a consistent error taxonomy
  • Enabling objective scoring across projects and vendors
  • Supporting quality improvement through detailed error analysis
  • Facilitating client communication with clear metrics

MQM Error Categories

MQM organizes errors into a hierarchical taxonomy. The main categories include:

Accuracy

Errors related to faithfulness to the source text:

  • Mistranslation — incorrect meaning conveyed
  • Omission — content from source not translated
  • Addition — content added not in source
  • Untranslated — source text left as-is

Fluency

Errors affecting readability in the target language:

  • Grammar — grammatical errors
  • Spelling — orthographic errors
  • Typography — formatting issues
  • Register — inappropriate formality level

Terminology

Errors in specialized vocabulary:

  • Inconsistent — same term translated differently
  • Wrong term — incorrect terminology used

Style

Errors related to writing conventions:

  • Awkward — unnatural phrasing
  • Company style — violations of style guide

Error Severity Levels

Each error is assigned a severity level:

SeverityDescriptionWeight
CriticalRenders content unusable, causes harm25+
MajorSignificantly impacts meaning or usability5-10
MinorNoticeable but doesn't impact understanding1-2

MQM Score Calculation

The MQM score is calculated using the formula:

Score = 100 - (Total Penalty Points / Word Count × 100)

Where penalty points are calculated by multiplying error counts by their severity weights.

Example Calculation

For a 1000-word document with:

  • 1 critical error (25 points)
  • 3 major errors (5 × 3 = 15 points)
  • 5 minor errors (1 × 5 = 5 points)

Total penalty: 45 points Score: 100 - (45/1000 × 100) = 95.5

MQM vs Other Frameworks

FrameworkFocusStandardization
MQMComprehensive error taxonomyISO 21999
DQFDynamic quality evaluationTAUS standard
LISA QAQA checklist approachLegacy (deprecated)

MQM and DQF are often used together — MQM provides the error taxonomy while DQF adds workflow integration.

Implementing MQM in Your Workflow

1. Define Quality Thresholds

Establish acceptable score ranges for your content types:

  • Marketing content: 98+
  • Technical documentation: 95+
  • Internal communications: 90+

2. Customize Error Weights

Adjust severity weights based on your priorities. For medical content, terminology errors might warrant higher penalties.

3. Train Your Team

Ensure all reviewers understand the error categories and apply them consistently.

4. Use Automated Tools

Platforms like KTTC automate MQM scoring, ensuring consistent evaluation across all projects.

FAQ

What is the difference between MQM and traditional QA?

Traditional QA often uses binary pass/fail criteria or subjective ratings. MQM provides granular error categorization and objective numerical scores, enabling data-driven quality management.

How do I choose which MQM categories to use?

Start with the core categories (Accuracy, Fluency, Terminology) and add domain-specific categories as needed. Most projects don't need the full taxonomy.

What is a good MQM score?

This depends on content type and client requirements. Generally:

  • 98+ is excellent
  • 95-98 is good for most content
  • Below 95 may require revision

Can MQM be used for machine translation evaluation?

Yes, MQM is commonly used to evaluate MT output quality, especially for MTPE (Machine Translation Post-Editing) workflows.

Conclusion

MQM provides the translation industry with a standardized, objective framework for quality assessment. By implementing MQM in your workflow, you can ensure consistent quality, facilitate clear communication with clients, and drive continuous improvement in your translation processes.

KTTC offers built-in MQM scoring, making it easy to implement this framework in your translation quality workflow.

Related Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between MQM and traditional QA?

Traditional QA often uses binary pass/fail criteria or subjective ratings. MQM provides granular error categorization and objective numerical scores, enabling data-driven quality management.

How do I choose which MQM categories to use?

Start with the core categories (Accuracy, Fluency, Terminology) and add domain-specific categories as needed. Most projects don't need the full taxonomy.

What is a good MQM score?

This depends on content type and client requirements. Generally: - 98+ is excellent - 95-98 is good for most content - Below 95 may require revision

Can MQM be used for machine translation evaluation?

Yes, MQM is commonly used to evaluate MT output quality, especially for MTPE (Machine Translation Post-Editing) workflows.

KTTC Team
3 min read

We use cookies to improve your experience. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.